Thursday, June 16, 2005

More Poemetry

I suppose "poemetry" is something like "telemetry" or "telepathy."

Case in point: Jane's Addiction's "Ritual de lo Habitual". Everyone knows it, everyone's heard it, most people were sick of it by the time they were 18. Recently, however, I decided to revisit it, and have been listening obsessively ever since. This is a fine album. Had I not begun to research poetry, though, I would never have noticed how fine.

Three Days: The most overplayed song in high school from this album. It was everyone's favorite song for, I suppose, mention of candles and incense, and possibly for it's extreme length, which meant infinitely less "getting up to mess with the stereo" for stoned teenagers.

What I'd never noticed was WHY the song is so long. As I listen to it now, I hear this: Starts out with that droning, almost medatitive intro... ritualistic overtones, then builds and builds into a total dervish almost imperceptibly with a constant, or at least recurring drumbeat and bassline that can only be described as "tribal". The tribal element comes up over and over and over in the album... "Habitually," perhaps? "Classic Girl" has a very similar drumbeat, for example.

I'm not a music critic, and I am probably doing a very poor job of explaning why I'm so impressed with these connections.

It has something to do with this, though: T.S. Eliot said that art exists as a substitute for religion, Joseph Campbell called artists, poets in particular, modern-day shaman. Kearouac was forever on about the divinity of fellow writers and friends who were obsessed with ideas as he was. So there's one question. To what degree is spirituality involved in art or the act of being an artist?

I started listening, essentially, to this entire album, as I would read a poem: Searching for common threads, connections to the title, images and sounds that stood out... clues, clues, clues... and discovered it to basically be an aural book of poetry. I would NEVER have come across this had I not learned how to enjoy poetry. So that's the second question: Is proper understanding of one artform sufficient to appreciate them all? If so, what does that say about the interconnectedness, and apparent irrelevance of preference of one form over another?

This is a little deeper than I'd normally get, but this issue is really preoccupying me. Ignore my clumsy wording; my brain is going a mile a minute.

4 Comments:

At 3:45 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

There are those that argue (and I can't remember who because literary theory is that far back in my past) that all art forms are there to instruct and delight, which means that all art forms have the same basic goal. Possibly this means that the more art forms you study, the closer you get to the truth because each has the same goal: To teach you something about life or to see life in a new way and each teaches you about a different part of life. Perhaps preference is just the easiest way for the truth to get in, but the more art you study, the more completely you understand what art is attempting to do. But I'm pretty rusty on the literary theory front, and I would take all of my ramblings with a grain of salt. :)

Lo

 
At 9:45 PM, Blogger Becky P. said...

And a shot of tequila, perhaps? *rimshot*

okay, actually, you make perfect sense, but that begged to be said...

 
At 12:02 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

In the absense of spirituality, art becomes less and less capable of providing meaning to those that experience it.

Our culture generally attempts to reinforce the idea that romantic or physical love can take the place of spiritual meaning. For example, compare how many popular movies and songs there are about romantic love rather than spirituality. Unfortunately this rarely "works" over the long term, and the attempt to make it effective become more and more vapid (unless I'm alone in thinking that, just perhaps, Britney Spears does not represent the height of spiritual expression).

with all that said, I've never heard Jane's Addiction's "Ritual de lo Habitual" :P

 
At 5:52 PM, Blogger Becky P. said...

*gasp*

Get this guy some Perry Farrell S.T.A.T!

Wow... I thought anyone between the ages of 20 and 40 had to know that album inside and out... like as a graduation requirement or something...

 

Post a Comment

<< Home